Community Needs Assessment — Print-Ready Summary
Name-free grouped findings from stakeholder responses related to the site’s historical legacy, current engagement, and next steps.
At a Glance
| Group | Count | Share | Length Profile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board/trustee/deacon | 7 | 64% | 5 long-term; 2 shorter or unreported |
| Pastor/minister | 1 | 9% | Mid-length |
| Vendor/contractor | 2 | 18% | Short-term or unreported |
| Other community participant | 1 | 9% | Unreported |
One-Page Executive Summary
Main Insight
The site’s historical legacy is a source of pride, but respondents want a shift toward visible, trusted, and practical neighborhood action.
Core Needs
Youth, seniors, food, health, mental health, housing, home preservation, jobs, reentry, and community cohesion.
Key Tensions
Legacy vs. present action; goodwill vs. capacity; visibility vs. trust; unity vs. division.
Partnership Signal
Respondents favor broad collaboration: schools, churches, city agencies, non-profits, health groups, housing services, neighborhood groups, and environmental groups.
Recommended 90-Day Actions
- Host a community trust and listening series.
- Form a partnership working group across schools, churches, agencies, and non-profits.
- Design a neighborhood resource hub for referrals and information.
- Launch two flagship programs: youth engagement and senior/food/health support.
- Create a simple public communication plan so the neighborhood can see what is happening.
Thematic Matrix
Responses grouped by association and length, with repeated themes compared.
| Theme | Board/trustee/deacon long-term |
Board/trustee/deacon shorter/unreported |
Pastor/minister mid-length |
Vendor/contractor short/unreported |
Other unreported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Historical awareness | Deep familiarity; learned over time; meetings, service, organizing | Learned later; legacy and story | Learned later through role/video | General local knowledge; project learning | Not familiar/not aware |
| Pride | Courage, unity, planning, service, impact | Moral witness, hope, preservation | Boldness despite danger | Sacrifice, perseverance, innovation | Practical stability |
| Current engagement | Mixed: active service or limited capacity | Struggle is real; involvement may be uneven | New struggle; division | Engaged but needs people/info/leadership | Not aware |
| Activation | Visibility, trust, hospitality, events, hub, youth, seniors, food, health, housing, jobs | Annual events, public visibility, unity | Hospitality and good-faith partnership | Impact in lives, physical environment, hearts/minds | Senior home energy and preservation |
| Partners | Schools, churches, city agencies, youth groups, homeless services, seniors, health, neighborhood, housing | Schools, churches, seniors, human rights orgs, heritage institutions | Churches, city agencies, non-profits | City, schools, historical institutions, neighborhood groups, foundations, churches | Housing services, elementary school, river/environment group |
| Underlying concern | Capacity, unity, leadership, sustained action | Legacy preservation and public awareness | Division, trust, moral responsibility | Information, leadership, tangible impact | Practical home/neighborhood needs |
Clean Grouped Report
No individual response names or contact details. Each group is summarized by role and reported length.
Group 1 — Board/trustee/deacon, long association
Count: 5 Length: 20+ years
- History/pride: Strong attachment to the site’s role in the historical racial-justice movement; pride in courage, unity, planning, and service.
- Current engagement: Mixed views. Some see ongoing food, mission, and community service; others see decline, limited manpower, or weaker leadership commitment.
- Action: Visibility, trust-building, hospitality, youth/senior programming, food/health/housing support, events, resource hub, leadership development.
- Partners: Schools, churches, city agencies, youth groups, homeless services, seniors, health agencies, neighborhood associations, housing/employment/reentry groups.
Group 2 — Board/trustee/deacon, shorter or unreported association
Count: 2 Length: Shorter or not clearly reported
- History/pride: Value legacy, preservation, storytelling, and hope.
- Current engagement: The struggle is real, but involvement may be limited or uneven.
- Action: Annual neighborhood events, public visibility, senior/children programming, unity.
- Partners: Schools, churches, seniors, human rights organizations, historical organizations, major heritage institutions.
Group 3 — Pastor/minister, mid-length association
Count: 1 Length: Mid-length
- History/pride: Sees the site’s history as a bold moral statement.
- Current engagement: Frames present challenges as a new and serious struggle, with division as a major concern.
- Action: Become more hospitable and open to good-faith collaboration.
- Partners: Churches, city agencies, non-profits, and any willing partners.
Group 4 — Vendor/contractor, short or unreported association
Count: 2 Length: Short-term or unreported
- History/pride: General local knowledge; learned more through project work; values sacrifice, perseverance, and innovation.
- Current engagement: Engaged, but calls for more people, better information, and stronger leadership.
- Action: Make a difference in people’s lives, the physical environment, and hearts/minds.
- Partners: City agencies, schools, historical institutions, neighborhood associations, foundations, business/advocacy groups, other churches.
Group 5 — Other community participant, unreported association
Count: 1 Length: Not reported
- History/current engagement: Not familiar or not aware.
- Action: Help senior homeowners with energy efficiency awareness and home preservation.
- Partners: Neighborhood housing services, a local elementary school, and a river/environment conservation group.
Infographic
Racial-Justice Legacy → Present Action
responses
board/trustee/deacon
known lengths